| JRiordan35 |
2009-06-04 21:07:39 |
To answer my own question above, Phishthoughts has posted that the "No spoilers" Ian Stone source was:
Ian Stone: (Schoeps CCM41(din)>Sonosax sx-m2>Edirol R-01)
It sounded great!! |
| mikefreed |
2009-06-04 22:23:30 |
| thanks to the tapers and the uploader |
| i_ween |
2009-06-04 23:18:50 |
| Big thumbs up!!! (fenway, please!!!) :) |
| muncie |
2009-06-04 23:46:49 |
downloading now...
thanks so much for the recording and the upload.
with appreciation,
peas! |
| hurricane25 |
2009-06-05 08:00:21 |
| any sample of the music available |
| tommyfaulkner |
2009-06-05 08:50:12 |
| Holy Cow...I'm listening to this in my MDR cans (the wife is still sleeping) and I can almost smell the sweet nectar of beer, sweat, and kgb. Thank you fellas, you have definitely raised the bar for the tour. |
| cvillehick |
2009-06-05 09:11:37 |
| took me four days to finish the hampton show. conversely, i saw 2 mb/s yesterday on another torrent which finished in less than 10 minutes. as for commenting on sound quality in the torrent, if that is a rule, it's many times not followed and frankly i can't see any point of not commenting on the sound, especially when it seems to be an unofficial competition with these phish shows as to who can a) up it first and b) have the best sound. the spirit of 'murca, babee. |
| dneblank |
2009-06-05 09:23:52 |
Sounds great. Nice stereo imaging. But what's with the 'A++?' What is this, Ebay?
Thanks for putting this one up. Can't wait for the 4th! |
| mst934 |
2009-06-05 09:36:35 |
| How close was this to the section? D2t1 of this source and the schoeps have the exact audible talking, actually, the entire show does. Good sound, a little bright for my liking, but thanks. |
| mfrem67 |
2009-06-05 10:17:37 |
| Thanks for posting! |
| YokohamaJ |
2009-06-05 11:19:25 |
| Thanks for the capture and the up, I appreciate it! |
| dannyboy1V |
2009-06-05 12:06:03 |
| As anyone looked at the waves form for this recording? This is wicked processed cheese. Although in a good way. Usually when I see a wave form that looks like that I am ready to hate the recording but I have to admit this sounds sweet!!! |
| dannyboy1V |
2009-06-05 12:07:08 |
| Even so I would like to hear this without the processing just for curiosity. Seems like a big chunk of the dynamic range has been lost. |
| dannyboy1V |
2009-06-05 12:10:27 |
| Yikes...3 posts in a row. Sorry. I didn't want to end with a negative comment - the is a very good recording. Almost as nice as the scheops FOB. |
| Kill_Devil_Falls |
2009-06-05 12:18:55 |
| You are right...this is processed cheese. Overly bright and over kill (levels). |
| Kill_Devil_Falls |
2009-06-05 12:19:34 |
At first glance this may sound OK - but then your ears start to hurt.
Sorry - just an opinion. |
| harryhood_jr |
2009-06-05 12:26:14 |
| when I saw the big swarm I had to check it out but this is not very good |
| harryhood_jr |
2009-06-05 12:26:58 |
| I am not sure why people just don't get the soundboards? It isn't like an AUD will ever sound better than what Phish puts out. |
| metawhy |
2009-06-05 12:50:40 |
"It isn't like an AUD will ever sound better than what Phish puts out."
I respectfully disagree |
| obaaron |
2009-06-05 13:00:43 |
Sounds good to me. I am curious to hear how the unprocessed compares though...
thanks again. |
